Posts Tagged ‘Housing Affordability’

The land of the severley unaffordable house.

Monday, January 23rd, 2012

The latest Demographia survey of World housing markets (see it here) shows that Auckland’s housing market is the 6th most unaffordable in the world. The average ratio of house prices to incomes in Auckland is 6.4, only marginally under London, and higher than in New York. New Zealand has no affordable housing markets, and not even any ‘moderately unaffordable’ markets by their definitions.

The state of NZ’s housing market is so bad that it even deserves a special mention in their report. I have included the main points below in quotes.

The report states that :
“The deterioration of housing affordability in many of the markets rated in the Demographia International Housing Affordability Survey is unprecedented based upon the available historical data. Australia and New Zealand, for example, which had legendary housing affordability from after World War II to the 1980s and 1990s have seen house prices reach levels that are double to nearly triple their historic ratio to household incomes. The economic evidence indicates that this trend is strongly related to the implementation of more restrictive land use regulations, especially measures that create scarcity in land for housing thus drive up prices.”

“New Zealand: Housing in New Zealand was severely unaffordable, with a Median Multiple of 5.4, nearly three-quarters above the historic affordability norm of 3.0. Housing had been affordable in the early 1990s, with a Median Multiple of under 3.0.
Auckland was the least affordable market, with a Median Multiple of 6.4. Along with Auckland, Christchurch (6.3), Tauranga-Western Bay of Plenty (5.9), Dunedin (5.2) and Wellington(5.1) were severely unaffordable. Three New Zealand markets were seriously unaffordable, Palmerston North (4.1), Napier-Hastings (4.8) and Hamilton (4.8). New Zealand had no affordable markets and no moderately unaffordable markets”

Why is New Zealand Real Estate so expensive?

I don’t believe that restrictive land policies are to blame for the massive increase in unaffordability, as the report states. This is an over-simplification. Do you think prices would have risen if the banks were unable to lend at such high multiples of a person’s income? Of course not. The real truth is that inflation has been under-reported in New Zealand, and there has been no restriction or regulation on how much banks can lend out and under what criterea, it’s completely up to the banks themselves.

If New Zealand had capital controls on lending for housing (for example banks can only lend at 3 times household income), then house prices could not have risen to the level that they are. Also the government needs to change the way they measure inflation to include housing credit effects. In the 1980′s and 1990′s, house prices tracked inflation very closely. In the latest boom, there was a massive divergence with inflation being reported as under 5% while houses went up by 20% a year at the peak.

The real culrpit here is unregulated controls on housing credit, fuelled by banks who had access to cheap money from offshore lending. Add into the mix, that the current way of measuring inflation through the cost of a basket of goods (i.e. the CPI index) does not take into account credit expansion due to housing speculation. It is a shame that NZ faces this problem, as it will hold it back economically for years to come.

NZ house prices follow classic bubble popping signs

Monday, June 28th, 2010

When bubbles burst they follow a familiar pattern

The bursting of every asset bubble follows classic signs – as postulated by Dr John Paul Rodrique and shown in the illustration below. This has a lot in common with the typical “ABC” correction pattern which is described in Elliot Wave theory. When a bubble bursts, it generally goes through the following stages:

1) Denial (It’s not really happening – it’s only a temporary blip before the uptrend continues!)

2) Bull trap (The market turns around and rallies back towards the former high – sucking investors back into the market)

3) Return to normal (Prices almost at their former topping levels, “normality has returned to the markets” in other words)

4) Fear (The market turns around and starts falling again – people become fearful)

5) Capitulation (Reality sinks in – people then panic and the market then sells off agressively)

6) Return to the mean (Finally prices or valuations return to their mean level – or back to the mean trendline)

bubble_phases

Phases of an asset bubble

With respect to Elliot Wave theory, when a market enters a “correction”, the pattern is what is typically called an “ABC” pattern. The correction has 3 phases:

A) The initial leg down

B) The bounce back towards (but not exceeding) the former high

C) The final leg down, taking the market below the low reached in the initial (A) leg down

Typical Elliot Wave Corrective Pattern

Typical Elliot Wave A-B-C Corrective Pattern

NZ Housing Market is displaying the classic pattern …

The NZ housing market is displaying the classic Elliot Wave ABC pattern and also consistent with Dr John Paul Rodrique’s Bubble Bursting theory. Take a look at the below chart which shows the NZ House Price index since the peak in 2007:

NZ House Price Index From Peak in June 2007 - May 2010

NZ House Price Index From Peak in June 2007 - May 2010

There is no question that the NZ Housing Market Boom from 2000-2007 was a classic bubble. With house prices going up some years by 20-25% in a year, the same house on the same street without any modifications appreciated about 100% from the start of the Boom (or “bubble”) to the peak in 2007. This was driven by the combination of key drivers in the Property Cycle coming together to create a property Boom but also a huge market influencer was the easy and cheap availability of mortgage credit that flowed into NZ from offshore banks during this period. Without the exceptionally cheap and easily available mortgage credit we would still have had an appreciation in values but it would simply not have been so extreme.

Let’s look at the NZ housing market bubble popping process since it began in 2007 with respect to our classic ABC corrective pattern and also Dr John Paul Rodrique’s bubble popping paradigm.

A) The “Denial” phase. NZ house prices fall 10% from the peak in October 2007 to the trough in Jan 2009.

B) The “Bull Trap” followed by the “Return to Normal” phase. NZ House Prices rise to just about 3% below their October 2007 Peak. Many people believe the bust is over and the market has returned to its “normal” behaviour (rising perpetually? ;-) )

C) The Fear, Capitulation and Return-to-Mean phase. These phases have yet to come but with prices starting to fall again it looks like leg C has already begun.

The road is long with many a winding turn….

What we know about the Property Cycle is that the typical property Slump lasts at least 60% of the length (in time) of the preceding Boom – by that token NZ’s property Slump should end somewhere around the end of the year 2011 or the beginning of the year 2012. It is going to take time (at least 2 more years) for the NZ market to return to the long term trendline rate of growth which is the “Return to Mean” point in Rodrique’s chart. Note that this does not mean that nominal values will fall anywhere near their pre-boom levels – but the affordability of homes or the return on investment (measured by the rental yield of a property) may fall to pre-boom levels or within a ballpark range. Only then can buying pressure step in to propel the market into a recovery phase.


At present interest rates are rising in NZ which is going to have a dampening effect on house prices. While unemployment seems to have peaked and the situation is improving, we know from previous studies that a housing recovery always lags the bottom of the employment cycle. It does not take much for house prices to enter a downwards spiral due to the fact that house price valuations are based off what a similar house in the neighbourhood last sold for. So if your neighbour’s house gets sold at a discount to market value, then that effectively marks down all the other house prices on the same street.  This effect works to build positive momentum for house prices when the market is rising but equally can create a downwards spiral of prices when the market is weak and sellers are forced to accept lower prices.

In my opinion NZ House Prices will fall to about 10% below their 2007 peak by the end of 2011. Wages and rental yields have a long way to go yet to returning NZ’s market to normal levels of affordability for the average first time buyer, or investor. We are not out of the woods yet!

New Zealand house prices more expensive than UK, USA

Tuesday, May 18th, 2010

How do NZ House Prices compare with the USA and UK?

Everyone generally accepts that NZ homes are highly unaffordable. But how unaffordable? I set out to find out – and uncovered the shocking truth. Not only do New Zealanders pay more for their homes than their UK/USA counterparts in terms of House-Price-to-Income multiples, but the average NZ house price is actually higher than both the UK and USA when you price these nation’s house prices into New Zealand Dollars (at the given exchange rate at the time of writing). This sounds almost unbelievable, but it is true – as the data below shows.

Average NZ House Price  NZD $405,235 (3.9% below the Q4 2007 peak ) – from Quotable Value as at 18th May 2010

Average US House Price USD $258,000 (18% below July 2006 peak) – from US Census Dept

Average UK House Price £167,802 (10% below Oct 2007 peak) – from Nationwide Building Society

Current Fx rates as at 18th May 2010

NZD/USD = 0.6976
NZD/GBP =
0.4822

Current house prices coverted into NZ dollars:

NZ Avg Price in NZD = $405,235
US Avg Price in NZD = $369,839
UK Avg Price in NZD =
$347,992

Differences in % between NZ house prices and the US/UK

US House Prices cost 8.73% less than NZ house prices (priced into NZD)
UK House Prices cost 14.12% less than NZ house prices (priced into NZD)

OK so let’s look at average salaries in NZ vs the UK/USA

NZ annual average salary = $43,836 (source Statistics NZ as at June 2009)
US average annual wage =
USD $41,334 (source Social Security Online mid-2008 )
UK median annual salary = £25,428 (source National Statistics Online April 2009)

Again let’s convert wages in the US and UK into $NZD

NZ average annual wage = NZD $43,836
US average annual wage = NZD $59,251
UK average annual wage = NZD $52,733

And now let’s calculate House Price to Income ratios:

NZ House-Price-Income-Multiple = 9.2
US House-Price-Income-Multiple = 6.2
UK
House-Price-Income-Multiple = 6.6

Conclusion

Based on the House Price to Annual Average Income ratio, NZ house prices are 48% more expensive than US homes and 39% more expensive than UK homes. The USA has the most affordable housing of the 3 nations.

New Zealand must address this huge imbalance in the economy. Let’s hope that the 2010 Budget from the National government goes some way towards restoring some normality into the NZ housing situation. There is an excellent explanation about how NZ house prices became so unaffordable by Rodney Dickens here .

Peter Waring